Verdict
Strong value pick
Cost per serving looks strong for this category, and nothing in the label story screams junk science - still match dose to your own goals and clinician input.
Strengths
- Serving size and count are explicit enough to sanity-check cost per dose.
- Value math beats typical peers in our rough category bands.
- Few moving parts on the label - easier to audit than a proprietary stack.
Watch-outs
- No major cons flagged beyond normal buyer diligence - still read the hub.
Best for
- Buyers who want alignment with our ingredient hub bar
- Shoppers prioritizing cost per serving
- Anyone who wants explicit serving math
Decision
Strong choice for most buyers in this category.
Open the better options below before you commit.
Next step
Verdict
Strong value pick
Best for
- Buyers who want alignment with our ingredient hub bar
- Shoppers prioritizing cost per serving
- Anyone who wants explicit serving math
Why we highlight this SKU
- Strong ingredient and actives mapping on our structured label rubric.
- Formula reads coherent versus noisy category averages.
- Value lane looks reasonable versus peers with similar scores.
- Additives and excipient story looks cleaner than many alternatives on file.
Catalog reference (may differ from retailer): €7.99
Size: tablet · 1 tablet · 60 Servings per container
Editorial score: 78 · Myprotein
Price and availability may change. Confirm on the retailer before you buy.
Some links are affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Not sure this is the best choice?
Compare with better alternativesBetter options on file
These SKUs score higher in our category-adjusted decision lens - compare before you buy.
- GymBeam Vitamin C 1000
GymBeam
79/ 100Overall
+5 decision pts+1 headline pts0.071 EUR / serving
Cheaper per serving vs this product: -0.062 EUR / serving
Fast jumps
Decision
Optimize this choice
What Myprotein Vitamin C Tablet gives up on the rubric, where you overpay, and SKUs that score higher in the same category (with per-serving price deltas when we have them).
Upgrade cost vs gain
About +1 score while saving about €0.06 per serving.
What the rubric flags
- No major cons flagged beyond normal buyer diligence - still read the hub.
Higher-scoring SKUs
Same category; sorted for score lift and comparable per-serving price when we have it.
- GymBeam Vitamin C CapsulesGymBeam
Score
79+1
Per serving
€0.07
vs this bottle
+1 score and save about €0.06
NOW Foods Vitamin C CapsulesNOW FoodsScore
78+0
Per serving
$0.13
vs this bottle
+0 score (price n/a)
Solgar Vitamin C TabletsSolgarScore
77+-1
Per serving
€0.20
vs this bottle
+-1 score for +€0.07- Redoxon Vitamin C TabletsRedoxon
Score
75+-3
Per serving
€0.47
vs this bottle
+-3 score for +€0.33
Editorial model only - not medical advice. Your current total is 78/100.
Head-to-head buckets: same-price upgrades, cheaper options, and premium lanes - same rubric, product-first.
Structured alternatives pageAt a glance
Score summary
Total score
78/100
Cost per serving looks strong for this category, and nothing in the label story screams junk science - still match dose to your own goals and clinician input.
Scores are editorial heuristics from label structure, ingredient hub signal, transparency cues, rough value math, and conservative safety - not lab assays or prescriptions.
Computed with the v1 product rubric on each page load when DB scores are incomplete.
Score breakdown
Seven fixed lanes. Each is scored 0-100 and weighted into the total. Interpretations are plain-language, not clinical endpoints.
- Ingredient quality / fit
Strong fit with a solid published hub signal - or a clean single-ingredient SKU.
- Dosage plausibility
Serving size is clear and the stated amount sits in a typical band for this category.
- Formula quality
Neutral or partially specified - no strong bonus or penalty.
- Additives & label (combined lane)
Mixed or moderate: some fillers, flavors, or structure flags - read the label intelligence block below.
- Transparency
Sparse brand or label narrative in our file - treat marketing claims skeptically.
- Value
Price per serving looks favorable versus rough category anchors in our model.
- Safety margin
Conservative lane: pulls from hub safety when available and avoids extreme label doses.
Label & additive intelligence
Structured excipient lines on file drive these scores - not lab testing. Burden tracks sweeteners, dyes, fillers, and similar add-ins; clarity tracks vague wording and proprietary structures. The combined lane is what feeds your total score.
Excipient / additive burden
66
Label clarity
74
Combined additives lane (in total)
70
- Lists added sugars or sugar-based carriers in our read - check carbs if that matters to you.
Pros and cons
Pros
- Serving size and count are explicit enough to sanity-check cost per dose.
- Value math beats typical peers in our rough category bands.
- Few moving parts on the label - easier to audit than a proprietary stack.
- Tied to a high-scoring ingredient hub in our model.
Cons
- No major cons flagged beyond normal buyer diligence - still read the hub.
Label & product facts
- Form
- tablet
- Serving size
- 1 tablet
- Servings per container
- 60
- Primary ingredient family
- Vitamin C
- Ingredients on file
- Vitamin C (500 mg)
- Certifications
- None listed
- Latest price on file
- €7.99
- Brand website
- www.myprotein.com
Where to buy
We have not attached verified buy links to this SKU yet. Check the brand site or a trusted retailer you already use - we will add calm, checked listings here as we expand coverage.
Some links are affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Editorial rankings and product scores stay independent of affiliate relationships; we do not let commissions change verdicts.
What does the evidence say about Vitamin C?
This SKU sits on top of our ingredient hub for Vitamin C: trial signal, safety notes, hype gap, and FAQs live there - not on this product page.
Related products
More from Myprotein
How this ranks in its category
Among 5 on-file SKUs in Vitamin C, this product sits #3 when we blend category fit, trust, value, and anti-gaming guards (decision score - not the same number as the headline total).
Decision score: 78 / 100 (sorting layer for lists and compare).
A stronger decision score exists in this category at a lower price per serving on file - check the alternatives block.
Best in Vitamin C
See ranked SKUs in this category with the same scoring model as this review.
Open category rankingsHow to read this verdict
Product scores compress evidence context from the ingredient hub (when live), structured excipient lines, transparency cues, rough value math, and a conservative safety check. They are informational, not medical advice or a substitute for label photos and professional guidance.
This page is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always read the actual label, consider interactions, and talk to a qualified clinician about your situation.
