About IsSupplementLegit

IsSupplementLegit operates as a supplement intelligence platform: fixed editorial criteria applied to ingredients and compounds, published as structured hubs with scores and sourced context. Output is designed for orientation and scrutiny - not for impulse purchase copy.

The surface is not a blog. Articles are not the primary unit; ingredient hubs, comparisons, and focused question pages are. Content is maintained as analysis records, not opinion columns.

No paid reviews. Verdicts and scores are not sold to brands and are not negotiated for placement. Editorial criteria are defined in advance and applied consistently.

No hidden promotions. Marketing relationships do not determine which ingredients receive coverage or how scores are set.

Affiliate links may appear on select pages as optional outbound retailer references. Where present, they are labeled and disclosed. They do not change scores, verdict labels, or analytical text. See the disclaimer and methodology.

• Ingredient analysis - Active ingredient identity, typical use contexts, and alignment (or misalignment) with human trial literature for the claims consumers encounter.
• Dosage validation - Label-level dosing and discussion notes checked against ranges commonly cited in evidence summaries and safety discussions, with under-dosing flagged where material.
• Claim verification - Marketing and social narratives compared to what published human data support; disconnect is surfaced explicitly.
• Value context - Where applicable, retail and category context may be noted to separate ingredient merit from shelf positioning. It does not override evidence or safety signals.

Language is system-driven and factual. Pages describe criteria, evidence limits, and scoring logic - not personal anecdotes or motivational narrative.

Nothing here constitutes medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Individual risk and drug interactions require a qualified clinician.