Is This Supplement Legit
Whey ProteinWhey Protein

Product verdict

GymBeam Impact Whey Protein Vanilla

GymBeam

74/ 100

Product score

Verdict

Strong value pick

Cost per serving looks strong for this category, and nothing in the label story screams junk science - still match dose to your own goals and clinician input.

Strengths

  • Serving size and count are explicit enough to sanity-check cost per dose.
  • Value math beats typical peers in our rough category bands.
  • Few moving parts on the label - easier to audit than a proprietary stack.

Watch-outs

  • Sweeteners, dyes, fillers, or blend-style structures show up more than we like for a minimalist buy.

Best for

  • Buyers who want alignment with our ingredient hub bar
  • Shoppers prioritizing cost per serving
  • Anyone who wants explicit serving math

Decision

Strong choice for most buyers in this category.

Buy this if the strengths match what you optimize for (see chips below).

High confidenceVerified or strong catalog coverage on this SKU.
  • High data confidence

Next step

Verdict

Strong value pick

Best for

  • Buyers who want alignment with our ingredient hub bar
  • Shoppers prioritizing cost per serving
  • Anyone who wants explicit serving math

Why we highlight this SKU

  • Strong ingredient and actives mapping on our structured label rubric.
  • Value lane looks reasonable versus peers with similar scores.
  • Ranks near the top of on-file peers in this category snapshot.
  • Common delivery form with a practical serving count for daily use.

Catalog reference (may differ from retailer): 34,90 €

Size: powder · 30 g · 67 Servings per container

Editorial score: 74 · GymBeam

See buying optionsView cleaner-label alternatives

Price and availability may change. Confirm on the retailer before you buy.

Some links are affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Not sure this is the best choice?

Compare with better alternatives

Fast jumps

Decision

Optimize this choice

What GymBeam Impact Whey Protein Vanilla gives up on the rubric, where you overpay, and SKUs that score higher in the same category (with per-serving price deltas when we have them).

What the rubric flags

  • Sweeteners, dyes, fillers, or blend-style structures show up more than we like for a minimalist buy.

Editorial model only - not medical advice. Your current total is 74/100.

Head-to-head buckets: same-price upgrades, cheaper options, and premium lanes - same rubric, product-first.

Structured alternatives page

At a glance

Score summary

Total score

74/100

Cost per serving looks strong for this category, and nothing in the label story screams junk science - still match dose to your own goals and clinician input.

Scores are editorial heuristics from label structure, ingredient hub signal, transparency cues, rough value math, and conservative safety - not lab assays or prescriptions.

Computed with the v1 product rubric on each page load when DB scores are incomplete.

Score breakdown

Seven fixed lanes. Each is scored 0-100 and weighted into the total. Interpretations are plain-language, not clinical endpoints.

  • Ingredient quality / fit

    Strong fit with a solid published hub signal - or a clean single-ingredient SKU.

  • Dosage plausibility

    Serving size is clear and the stated amount sits in a typical band for this category.

  • Formula quality

    Forms we flag as weaker for the category (e.g., magnesium oxide) or under-specified blends.

  • Additives & label (combined lane)

    Heavier sweetener/dye/excipient signals, vague blend-style wording, or proprietary structures in our read.

  • Transparency

    Sparse brand or label narrative in our file - treat marketing claims skeptically.

  • Value

    Price per serving looks favorable versus rough category anchors in our model.

  • Safety margin

    Conservative lane: pulls from hub safety when available and avoids extreme label doses.

Label & additive intelligence

Structured excipient lines on file drive these scores - not lab testing. Burden tracks sweeteners, dyes, fillers, and similar add-ins; clarity tracks vague wording and proprietary structures. The combined lane is what feeds your total score.

Excipient / additive burden

54

Label clarity

63

Combined additives lane (in total)

58

  • Uses a proprietary blend or matrix - individual ingredient amounts are often opaque.
  • Contains non-sugar sweeteners (e.g., sucralose, stevia) - relevant if you avoid them for taste or preference.
  • Contains color additives (e.g., caramel color, titanium dioxide) - usually a disclosure issue, not a drama headline.
  • Uses vague flavor language (e.g., “natural flavors”) where specificity is limited on the label we mirrored.

Cross-check amounts and full ingredient order on pack photos - blends and vague flavors hide detail.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Serving size and count are explicit enough to sanity-check cost per dose.
  • Value math beats typical peers in our rough category bands.
  • Few moving parts on the label - easier to audit than a proprietary stack.
  • Tied to a high-scoring ingredient hub in our model.

Cons

  • Sweeteners, dyes, fillers, or blend-style structures show up more than we like for a minimalist buy.

Label & product facts

Form
powder
Serving size
30 g
Servings per container
67
Primary ingredient family
Whey Protein
Ingredients on file
Whey Protein (22 g) Glycine (1 g, flavor matrix component)
Certifications
None listed
Latest price on file
34,90 €
Brand website
gymbeam.com

Where to buy

We have not attached verified buy links to this SKU yet. Check the brand site or a trusted retailer you already use - we will add calm, checked listings here as we expand coverage.

Some links are affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Editorial rankings and product scores stay independent of affiliate relationships; we do not let commissions change verdicts.

What does the evidence say about Whey protein?

This SKU sits on top of our ingredient hub for Whey protein: trial signal, safety notes, hype gap, and FAQs live there - not on this product page.

How this ranks in its category

Among 37 on-file SKUs in Whey Protein, this product sits #1 when we blend category fit, trust, value, and anti-gaming guards (decision score - not the same number as the headline total).

Decision score: 73 / 100 (sorting layer for lists and compare).

Why the model says that

  • High data confidence

Best in Whey Protein

See ranked SKUs in this category with the same scoring model as this review.

Open category rankings

How to read this verdict

Product scores compress evidence context from the ingredient hub (when live), structured excipient lines, transparency cues, rough value math, and a conservative safety check. They are informational, not medical advice or a substitute for label photos and professional guidance.

This page is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always read the actual label, consider interactions, and talk to a qualified clinician about your situation.